I am not unaware of what
drives me. I am slow to recognize my feelings; however, once I recognize them I
generally understand them. That is certainly the case with my feelings
over recent church interactions.
The essence of my church
disappointment is I am being told I must believe in a certain way to be
acceptable. This is not the message I read in the gospels when I first saw
them. The message I read is that the poor, the diseased, the ritually unclean,
those unable to afford sacrificial animals, strangers, prostitutes and tax
collectors, all are acceptable to God. That God's kingdom was all around us and
available to us if we only will seek. I read not so much a promise of
redemption by belief in sacrificial death as a promise of forgiveness and
acceptability, a living mercy that leads to redemption.
And I loved this. It was
beautiful to me. The idea that I might be acceptable to God, with my
peculiarities, my failings, my sloth and gluttony, my greed and lust, my
filthiness. That was and is beautiful to me. And that, perhaps, by
contemplation of the Bible, I might find a better way, some way not to desire
as I desire, not to ache as I ache, not to be angry as I am angry. To discover,
in the words of Revelation which I love, an end to death and pain and suffering,
for the old order really had passed away.
So it is especially hurtful
to me to be told that my understanding, my profound belief, is not acceptable.
I cannot speak about a message that is profoundly beautiful to me. My words, my
thoughts, are unacceptable. I experience the very thing I have sought to find
relief from- unacceptability, judgment, ostracism. The paradox is that, as I
read and experience it, God brings, peace, acceptance, forgiveness, but the
church brings only exclusion, condemnation, rejection.
My upset extends beyond
theological issues. I have no special idea of self worth. I am quite cynical
about it. I am not handsome, not a desirable conversation partner, not fluid
and easy in parties. I received lots of female attention as a resident, but
only because women wanted to be Mrs. Doctor, not because they were fascinated
by me. The most flattering thing in my married life is that my wife has made it
clear in many ways ever since we met that she likes me. Me. It remains a consoling mystery that she
can be kind to me, accept me as I am.
My experience of much of
early life was rejection. Teasing, hitting, abusing, cursing. Blood, death,
fights, screaming. Not fitting into my school, not liking my home. Wanting to
escape. I have no reservoir of good experiences on which to build a sense of
self worth. Instead, all my life I have tried to prove my worth every day by
what I do. My sense of worth is built on what I can do, not on what I am.
Whether singing, operating, counseling patients, teaching, building models,
composing, I define myself by what I do and think.
It is thus a very personal
rejection to be told that what I think is unacceptable. It is a destruction of
the only foundation of worth I really have, while simultaneously telling me
that I am unacceptable to God unless I believe and recite the things the Church
believes and recites. It is a broad and complete damaging of both self worth
and the hope of acceptability.
Unsurprisingly, I react
strongly, defensively and aggressively.
I think others do as well. My
discussion of the non-literality of the Bible and human status of Jesus likely
damages the self definition of many, just as they have damaged mine. They have
reacted in the same anger and fear I have felt, with theirs magnified by fear
for their church, to which I am a newcomer and a stranger. And for all that I
have little sense of intrinsic worth I do have a very large, broad and deep
reservoir of accomplishments. Not everyone does, and so their sense of acceptability
and redemption may be more threatened than mine.
I found my first sense of
comfort, of belonging, of acceptability, in the chapel of my school. I would go
there during breaks just because it felt warm and welcoming. I have sat in
sanctuaries simply to meditate and feel the numinous. It is at such times that
I feel the presence of God. It is a terrible shame that the church must insist
on a particular formulaic understanding of God in order to be acceptable in
church.
The experience of God is a
singularity, much like the many languages in which the Spirit was heard at
Pentecost. I don't see why a church has to stuff all such singularities into a
common, restrictive definition. That assaults my sense of God, of religion and
of self, and that is more than my little soul can stand.
Apostate Monster
AMEN good Sir!
ReplyDeleteAnd thank you for softening the anguish of a teenager.....