I read with interest Bart Stupak's decision not to run again for his seat. No matter which way this man turns, someone hates him. To the right, he is the man responsible for the passage of an abomination of a health care bill. To the left, he is the man who held up and nearly destroyed the health care bill. To abortion opponents, he lacked the real strength of his convictions, instead hiding behind a fig leaf of an executive order, which of course can be undone by the next executive.
I do understand that the process of 'making legislation' is not a pretty one. However, the apparent self betrayal of this man trumps all the political advantages or problems he created for himself and others.
A few days ago I talked about sin as being based in fear. So is self-loathing. If Bart Stupak could not live with himself in voting for the health care bill, then he should have voted against it. If he was truly satisfied with the Senate provisions (and they were quite strong), then he never should have made a fuss in the first place.
Jesus made no pronouncements about abortion. We do not know if he was married, if he had children, and precious little else about his personal life except that he had siblings. Whatever Jesus' feelings about abortion would have been, I am quite sure he would not have modified them to please either a Jewish or a Roman government. Your values are what they are, and when you compromise them, you compromise yourself.
This is the original meaning of belief- something around which your life is centered. Apparently Stupak felt strongly enough about abortion to fuss about it, but not so strongly that he was willing to take any heat about it. In the end, we must be forced to make choices under duress. We all have to. And that is when we learn what our values really are. Stupak was not willing, in the end, to stand up for what he believed in, and this, more than any heat from left or right, is what destrtoyed him as a politician, and more importantly, as a man.
Ted
I do understand that the process of 'making legislation' is not a pretty one. However, the apparent self betrayal of this man trumps all the political advantages or problems he created for himself and others.
A few days ago I talked about sin as being based in fear. So is self-loathing. If Bart Stupak could not live with himself in voting for the health care bill, then he should have voted against it. If he was truly satisfied with the Senate provisions (and they were quite strong), then he never should have made a fuss in the first place.
Jesus made no pronouncements about abortion. We do not know if he was married, if he had children, and precious little else about his personal life except that he had siblings. Whatever Jesus' feelings about abortion would have been, I am quite sure he would not have modified them to please either a Jewish or a Roman government. Your values are what they are, and when you compromise them, you compromise yourself.
This is the original meaning of belief- something around which your life is centered. Apparently Stupak felt strongly enough about abortion to fuss about it, but not so strongly that he was willing to take any heat about it. In the end, we must be forced to make choices under duress. We all have to. And that is when we learn what our values really are. Stupak was not willing, in the end, to stand up for what he believed in, and this, more than any heat from left or right, is what destrtoyed him as a politician, and more importantly, as a man.
Ted
Comments
Post a Comment